

In co-operation with the Arrested Lawyers Initiative, we launched a new project aimed at ensuring Turkey complied with ECHR rulings, in particular Grand Chamber’s Yüksel Yalçınkaya v Türkiye.

European Court of Human Rights and the Turkish Judiciary
The independence of the Turkish judiciary remains a significant concern, highlighted by various Council of Europe bodies as a primary factor contributing to serious human rights violations. The Committee of Ministers has consistently called on Turkey to resolve these issues, especially in light of resolutions enforcing European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) judgments in high-profile cases such as those involving Selahattin Demirtas and Osman Kavala.
Turkey has one of the worst track records in terms of delayed or non-implementation of ECHR judgments. The state currently faces an infringement proceeding, underscoring the severity of these concerns.
Since 2016, the broad application of Article 314 of the Turkish penal code has resulted in the prosecution of over 400,000 individuals on charges of terrorism. This includes more than 100,000 individuals prosecuted for using ByLock, an app the government alleges is linked to the Gulen Movement. In a landmark ruling (Yüksel Yalçınkaya v Türkiye) in September 2023, the ECHR’s Grand Chamber condemned the conviction of individuals based solely on ByLock usage, ruling it a violation of the principle that there should be no punishment without law. The Court recognized this issue as systemic, demanding that Turkey implement general measures and criticized the reliance on ByLock evidence as a breach of fair trial rights.
This video covers the details of ECHR’s Yüksel Yalçınkaya judgment
Following this judgment, a coalition of NGOs, legal scholars, and human rights advocates called on the president of the Turkish Constitutional Court to regard the ECHR’s decision as a pivotal moment for judicial normalization. For instance, The Arrested Lawyers Initiative and the Norwegian Helsinki Committee led a coalition of international human rights organizations and esteemed legal professionals to send an open letter to Prof. Dr Zühtü Arslan, the President of the Constitutional Court of Türkiye, expressing concerns over the Turkish judiciary’s adherence to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR).

The Arrested Lawyers Initiative led a coalition of international human rights organisations and legal experts in sending a letter to the TCC urging it to comply with ECHR judgments, in particular the recent Yalcinkaya judgment.
by The Arrested Lawyers Initiative13 October 2023
Project Aims and Objectives
The enforcement of ECHR judgments is overseen by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (COE) following verdicts. It is crucial that Turkish authorities implement these judgments, particularly in landmark cases like the Yalcinkaya case, which affects tens of thousands.
The project will target both individual and general measures mandated by these judgments. Individual measures may include retrials or compensation, while general measures will focus on preventing similar future violations.
Planned Outputs
This project is partially funded by prestigious Sigrid Rausing Trust grant.